Clyde Dam Statistics
- Site chosen: 1976
- Construction: 1977-1993
- Commissioned: 1992-1993
- Type of Dam: Concrete gravity dam (largest in NZ)
- Dam Height: 102 metres
- Net Head of Water: 60 metres
- Width at Base: 70 metres
- Width at Top: 10 metres
- Length at Top: 490 metres
- Penstocks: 4 (plus 2 encased in concrete)
- Spillways: 4 with radial arm gates
- Sluices: 1 low level with radial arm gate
- Planned Capacity: 612MW
- Installed Capacity: 432MW
- Lost Capacity: 180MW (due to re-design error in 1982)
- Turbines: 4x Francis fixed-blade turbines connected to 108MW salient pole generators
- Total Concrete Poured: Approx. one million cubic metres
- Steel used in Penstocks: Approx. 1,350 tonnes
- Total Steel used: Unknown
- Weight of Dam: Approx. 3 million tonnes
- Annual Energy Generated: Averages 2,100GWh
- Reservoir Size: 26.4 square kilometres
- Reservoir Fill Time: 18 months (reached full operating level September 1993)
- Major Landslide Zones: 14 extending along the gorge from Cromwell to the dam
- Stabilisation Tunnels: 18kms of tunnels dug during gorge stabilization work
- Measuring and Monitoring Instruments: 6,500 originally installed
- Drainage Mitigation: 140 kilometres of drilling for drainage
- Landslide Buttressing: 5 million cubic metres of rock used in buttressing work
- Land Flooded: 2,300 hectares
- Operational Range of Reservoir: Between 193.5 to 194.5 metres above sea level
- Reservoir Storage Capacity: Described as "Not much"
Stabilisation Cost: $936 million (2005 value)
TOTAL Project Cost: $1.4 to 2 Billion (exact cost is unavailable or unknown)
Operation: The reservoir does not have much storage capacity, so the Clyde dam operates mainly on a ‘run of the river’ basis, with the average flow past the dam reflecting the natural flow of the Clutha and Kawarau Rivers. The expected variation of the reservoir is about 50cms. When inflows are low, storage at Lake Hawea is drawn down to compensate. The high dam option (Scheme F) was built supposedly to maximise generation and cost-efficiency. But the low dam option (Scheme H) could also have operated on a ‘run of the river’ basis with only 2% less output, avoiding the loss of old Cromwell, Lowburn, and a massive cost overrun. The low dam (Scheme H) would also have incurred fewer landslide issues, retaining 16kms of the original 21 km highway through the Cromwell Gorge. However, both options were inherently flawed, and were not defensible when measured against the geo-technical risks, landslide mitigation costs, long-term reservoir sedimentation issues and costs - including eventual decommissioning, loss of ecosystem integrity, and heritage and human costs.