Large Dams on Active Faults ~ Expert Opinion
'As a general guideline, if significant movement along a fault crossing the dam site is accepted as a reasonable possibility during the lifetime of the dam, the best advice is to select an alternative site, less exposed to geodynamic hazard. Such a standpoint is supported by the fact that no dam, foreseen to successfully survive the shearing action of a fault slip in its foundation, has ever been exposed to actual test under such event.
In general, concrete dams should not be accepted for sites affected by active tectonic features.'
Quote from:
'Dam design - the effects of active faults,' by -
Martin Wieland, Chairman, ICOLD Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, Poyry Energy Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland.
A. Bozovic, Former Chairman, ICOLD Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, Consultant, Belgrade, Serbia.
R.P. Brenner, Past Chairman, ICOLD Committee on Dam Foundations, Consultant, Weinfelden, Switzerland.
Dated Tuesday, August 19, 2008.
International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).
References:
More...
Allen, C.R. & Cluff, L.S., 2000. Active faults in dam foundations: an update. Proc. 12th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, Paper 2490, 8p.
Amberg W. & Lombardi G., 1982. Abnormal behaviour of Zeuzier arch dam in Switzerland, Static analysis, Wasser Energie Luft, Special Issue to ICOLD, 74(3):102-109.
Bray, J.D., Seed, R.B., Cluff, L.S. & Seed, H.B., 1994. Earthquake fault rupture propagation through soils. J. Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 120(3):543-561.
Gillon M.D., Meija L.H., Freeman S.T. & Berryman K.R., 1997. Design criteria for fault rupture at the Matahina dam, New Zealand, Int. J. on Hydropower and Dams, 4(2):120-123.
Hatton J.W., 1991. Clyde Dam slip joint, Trans. 17th Congress on Large Dams, Discussion Q.66-7, 5:365-367.
Gilg, B., Indermaur W., Matthey F. Pedro, O., Azevedo, M. & Ferreira, F., 1987. Special design of Steno arch dam in Greece in relation with possible fault movements. Proc. Int. Symposium on Earthquakes and Dams, Beijing, Chinese National Committee on Large Dams, 1:202-218.
ICOLD, 1989. Selecting Seismic Parameters for Large Dams, Guidelines, Bulletin 72, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, ICOLD, Paris.
ICOLD, 1998. Neotectonics and Dams, Bulletin 112, Committee on Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, ICOLD, Paris.
McMorran, T. & Berryman, K., 2001. Late Quaternary faulting beneath Matahina dam. Proc. Symp. on Engineering and Development in Hazardous Terrain, Christchurch, New Zealand Geotechnical Society, pp. 185-193.
Mejia, L., Walker, J. & Gillon, M., 2005. Seismic evaluation of dam on active surface fault, Proc. Conf. Waterpower XIV, Austin, Texas, USA, Paper 066, HCI Publications Inc., July, 2005.
Sherard J.L., 1967. Earthquake considerations in earth dam design, J. Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 83(SM-4):377-401.
Sherard J.L., Cluff L.S. & Allen C.R., 1974. Potentially active faults in dam foundations, Géotechnique, 24(3):367-428.
Wells D.L. & Coppersmith K.J., 1994. New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement, Bulletin Seismological Society of America, 84(4):974 -1002.
Wieland M.; Brenner R.P.; Sommer P. 2003. Earthquake resilience of large concrete dams: Damage, repair, and strengthening concepts. Trans. 21st Int. Congress on Large Dams, Montreal, Q83-R10, 3:131-150.